Technologies for learner-centered feedback

Jane Costello, Daph Crane

Abstract


As the number, type, and use of technologies to support learning increases, so do the opportunities for using these technologies for feedback. Learner-centered feedback is a core to the teaching-learning process. It is related to assessment in describing how learners perform in their learning, their gain in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Feedback, types of feedback, guidelines for effective learner-centered feedback, and feedback’s relationship to assessment are presented. Methods of providing feedback, for example, automated, audio scribe pens, digital audio, etc., and the related technologies are described. Technologies that allow instructors to make informed decisions about the use of various methods for feedback are discussed.


Keywords


feedback, learner-centered, technology, ICTs, assessment

References


Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 91-119). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from: http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/second_edition.html

Bates, T. (2008). Transforming distance education through new technologies. In T. Evans, M. Haughey & D. Murphy (Eds.), The international handbook of distance education [Electronic version]. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Press (pp. 215-235). Retrieved from: http://www.tonybates.ca/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/evans.pdf

Bennett, R. E. (2002). Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(1), 1-24. Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1667

Boud, D. (1988). Moving towards autonomy. In D. Boud (Ed.), Developing Student Autonomy in Learning (2nd ed., pp. 17-39). London: Kogan Page.

Boud & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.iml.uts.edu.au/assessment-futures/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf

Brown Wessling, S. (2013). Podcasting to Personalize Feedback. Retrieved from https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/student-feedback-through-technology

Bull, J. & McKenna, C. (2004). Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment (pp. 52-62). New York: Routledge Falmer.

Buzzetto-More, N. A. & Alade, A. J. (2006). Best practices in e-assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 251-269.

Cantor, J. (2008). Delivering Instruction to Adult Learners (3rd ed.). Toronto: Wall & Emerson.

Connor, W. R. (1993). Liberal Arts in Education in the Twenty-First Century, AALE Occasional Papers in Liberal Arts #2. Retrieved from http://www.aale.org/pdf/connor.pdf

Costello, J. (2009). E-feedback Best Practices. Unpublished Report, Distance Education and Learning Technologies, Memorial University, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Costello, J. & Crane, D. (2009, October). Providing learner-centered feedback using a variety of technologies. Paper presented at EDGE 2009 conference, St. John’s, Newfoundland.

Crane, D. (2010). Feedback to enhance learning. Unpublished Manuscript, Centre for Distance Education, Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada.

Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M. & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x

Farmer, L. S. J. (2005). Using technology to facilitate assessment of library education, Teacher Librarian, 32(2), 12-15.

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L. E., Bateman, S. & Mandryk, R. L. (2011). Calibration games: making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements. Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Santa Barbara, California, USA: ACM.

Friesen, N. (2009). Rethinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods and practice. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

HEFCE (2010). Effective Practice in a Digital Age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. London: JISC. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/elearning/effpraceassess.pdf

Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25. Retrieved from: http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v11n2/using-asynchronous-audio-feedback-enhance-teaching-presence-and-students%E2%80%99-sense-community

Kellough, R. D. & Kellough, N. G. (1999). Middle School Teaching: A Guide to Methods and Resources (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Ko, S. (2009). Different approaches to providing feedback in the online classroom. Newburyport, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/node/1557

Lizzio, A. & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment; students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 236-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548

Lourillard, D. (2007). Rethinking University Teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.

Mohr, D. (2010, July). Providing effective feedback in online courses for student learning. Sloan C Foundation Webinar. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDw6ONhd5ys

Nichol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53-64.

Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L. Gallien, T. L. & Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Technology, 4(3), 267-276. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no3/oomen-early_0908.htm

Parton, B., S., Crain-Dorough, M. & Hancock, R. (2010). Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students? International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(1), 15-23. Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Jan_10/article02.htm

Race, P., Brown, S. & Smith, B (2005). 500 Tips on assessment. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.

Riedl, M.O. & Young, R.M. (2006). From Linear Story to Branching Story Graphs. The IEEE Journal of Computer Graphics and Applications, 26(3), 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.56 Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/riedl-aiide05.pdf

Sclater, N., Conole, G., Warburton, B. & Harvey, J. (2007). E-assessment, In G. Conole & M. Oliver. (Eds.). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice (pp. 147-159). London: Routledge.

Schmitt, E. M., Hu, A. C. & Bachrach, P. S. (2008). Course evaluation and assessment: Examples of a learner-centered approach. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 29(3), 290-300.

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M. & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and Learning at a Distance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Steinweg, B., Williams, S. C. & Warren, S. (2006). Reaching through the screen: Using a tablet PC to provide feedback in online classes. Rural Education Quarterly 25(2), 8-12.

Tuzi, F. (2001). E-Feedback’s impact in ESL writers’ revisions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of Teachers of English Speakers and Other Languages (TESOL). St. Louis, MO. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED463651.pdf


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.