Reflections on assessment in Open Distance Learning (ODL): the case of the University of South Africa (UNISA)

Moeketsi Letseka, Victor Pitsoe

Abstract


The article explores the challenges of assessment in open distance learning (ODL). The authors argue that ultimately assessment should be about improving the quality of teaching and effective learning. It should be based on making expectations explicit and public, setting appropriate criteria and high standards for learning quality, systematically gathering, analyzing and interpreting evidence to determine how well performance matches expectations and standards, and using the resultant information to document, explain, and improve performance. However, getting all these variables to work in ODL presents mammoth challenges. How can ODL lecturers validate and authenticate students’ written work? How can they tell whether the students’ submitted work sufficiently reflects their knowledge and understanding? South Africa has inherited an unequal, racially skewed and inequitable educational provision from its apartheid past. This poses serious challenge for assessing quality. The article therefore seeks to understand these context-specific challenges of ODL assessment at UNISA.


Keywords


assessment, open distance learning (ODL), teaching, learning, challenges

References


Angelo, T. A. (1991). Ten easy pieces: assessing higher learning in four dimensions. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 46, 17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914604

Angelo, T. A. (1994). Classroom assessment: involving faculty and students where it matters most. Assessment Update, 6(4), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/au.3650060402

Angelo, T. A. (1995). Reassessing (and defining) assessment. AAHE Bulletin, 48(3), 7-9.

Angelo, T. A. (1999). Doing Assessment as if learning matters most. AAHE Bulletin, 59(9), 3-6. Retrieved from http://www.aahea.org/aahea/articles/angelomay99.htm

Ball, C. (1985). Fitness for Purpose: Essays in Higher Education. Surrey: SRHE &NFER-NELSON.

Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Brown, S. & Knight, P. (2004). Assessing Learners in Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge-Falmer.

Cohen, M. (2008). Participation as assessment: political science and classroom assessment techniques. Political Science & Politics, 41(3), 609-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508080827

Frazer, M. (1994). Quality in higher education: an international perspective. In D. Green (Ed.). What is Quality in Higher Education (pp. 101-111). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Green, D. (Ed.) (1994). What is Quality in Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Hunsaker, S. (2004). Scholarly assessment. Perspective, 4(1), 1-4.

Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative Assessment in Higher Education: practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275-286. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1080/03075070220000662

Letseka, M. & Pitsoe, V. (2012). Access to higher education through Open Distance Learning (ODL): reflections on the University of South Africa (UNISA). In R. Dhunpath & R. Vithal (Eds.). Access to Higher Education: Under-prepared Students or Under-prepared Institutions? Cape Town: Pearson.

Letseka, M. & Pitsoe, V. (2013). The challenges and prospects of access to higher education at UNISA. Forthcoming in Studies in Higher Education.

Massy, W. F. (2003, June 20). Auditing higher education to improve quality. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Mentkowski, M. (2000). Learning that lasts: Integrating learning, development, and performance in college and beyond. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rowntree, D. (1996). Exploring Open and Distance Learning. Cornwall: Open University.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

South African Qualifications Authority’s (SAQA). (2001). Criteria and guidelines for Assessment of NQF Registered Unit Standards and Qualifications, Pretoria: SAQA Quality Assurance and Development.

Taylor, C. J. (2005). Assessment and the academic librarian. Paper presented at the Iowa Private Academic Libraries Conference, March 16.

UNISA. (2008). UNISA Open Distance Learning Policy. Pretoria: UNISA Press.

UNISA. (2010). Hons BED General Tutorial Letter 301/2010: Introduction to Programme. Pretoria: UNISA Press.

UNISA. (2012). An Institutional Profile: UNISA Facts & Figures. Pretoria: Department of Institutional Statistics & Analysis.

Venter, E., Higgs, L., Jeevanatham, L., Letseka, M. & Mays, T. (2006). Theory and Research in Education. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 115-126.

Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.