PRAXIS: Open Educational Practices and Open Science to face the challenges of critical Educational Action Research

Ada Czerwonogora, Virginia Rodés

Abstract


The paper presents the findings from PRAXIS, an educational action research project developed within academic professional learning communities (PLC) in the context of public higher education in Uruguay. As a strategy towards fostering teaching innovation, we explored the potential and benefits of academic PLC for the reflection and transformation of teaching practices, and the integration of digital technologies in a meaningful way into teaching. The approach was based on Open Science (OS) and Open Educational Practices (OEP) as foundational frameworks to face the challenges of critical Educational Action Research. Key findings of the project emphasise the impact of PRAXIS framework combining OEP, OS, and academic PLC, as well as collaborative and participatory technologies for the transformation of teaching and educational research practices.


Keywords


Educational action research (EAR), professional learning communities (PLC), teacher training, digital technologies (DT), open educational practices (OEP), open science (OS)

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Albornoz, A. (2019, February 6). Reimagining Open Science Through a Feminist Lens - Denisse Alejandra. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@denalbz/reimagining-open-science-through-afeminist-lens-546f3d10fa65

Alonso, A. & Gewerc, A. (2015). La formación permanente en TIC del profesorado en Galicia: ¿Volvemos a tropezar con la misma piedra? [ICT teachers’ lifelong training in Galicia: Do we always trip over the same stone?] Innovación Educativa 25, 269–282. Retrieved from http://www.usc.es/revistas/index.php/ie/article/view/2757

Avidov-Ungar, O. (2018). Professional development communities: the perceptions of Israeli teacher-leaders and program coordinators. Professional development in Education, 44 (5), 663–677.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1388269

Bastian M., Heymann S., & Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154

Borgatti, S., Mehra, A., Brass, D., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, 323, 892–895.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. Deakin University.

Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096

Cronin. C. (2018). Openness and praxis: A situated study of academic staff meaning-making and decision-making with respect to openness and use of open educational practices in higher education (doctoral thesis). National University of Ireland, Galway. Retrieved from https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/handle/10379/7276

Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825

Czerwonogora, A., & Rodés, V. (2019). PRAXIS: transformación de las prácticas de enseñanza universitaria con tecnologías digitales [PRAXIS: transformation of university teaching practices with digital technologies]. In: Acevedo, F., Nossar, K. & Viera, P. (Comps.) Libro de las IIV Jornadas Binacionales de Educación “Docencia, aprendizaje y ciudadanía. Formación política y políticas de formación” (pp. 113–122). Retrieved from http://jbe.cfe.edu.uy/materiales/JBE7%20Libro.pdf

Del Mastro, C., & Monereo, C. (2014). Incidentes críticos en los profesores universitarios de la PUCP [Critical incidents in PUCP university professors]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior (RIES), V(13), 3–20. Retrieved from http://ries.universia.net/index.php/ries/article/view/268

Domingo, A (2011). Anatomía de la acción. Modelo ATOM [Anatomy of action. ATOM model]. Práctica reflexiva. Retrieved from https://practicareflexiva.pro/anatomia-de-la-accion/

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes [England]; Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Esteve, O. (2011). Desarrollando la mirada investigadora en el aula. La práctica reflexiva: herramienta para el desarrollo profesional como docente [Developing the research look in the classroom. Reflective practice: tool for teacher professional development]. In: Ruiz Bikandi (Coord.), Lengua Castellana y Literatura. Investigación, innovación y buenas prácticas (pp. 29–48).

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=6359

Freire, P. (1969). La educación como práctica de la libertad [Education as a freedom practice]. Montevideo: Editorial Tierra Nueva.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2005). El e-learning en el siglo XXI [E-learning in the 21st century]. Barcelona: Octaedro.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87−105.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gewerc, A., Montero, L., & Lama, M. (2014). Collaboration and Social Networking in Higher Education. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 21(42), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-05

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning (Edition: Underlining Writing in Book). Granby, Mass: Praeger.

Hadar, L., & Brody, D. (2010). From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a community of learners among teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1641–1651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.015

Hairon, S., Goh, J. W. P, Siew Kheng Chua, C., & Wang, L. (2017). A research agenda for professional learning communities: moving forward, Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 72–86 https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1055861

Krebs, V. (2000). The social life of routers. Internet Protocol Journal, 3, 14–25. Retrieved from: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/press/internet-protocol-journal/back-issues/table-contents-7/ipjarchive/article09186a00800c83eb.html

Lancaster, A. K., Thessen, A. E., & Virapongse, A. (2018). A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem. F1000Research, 7, 803. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15078.1

Latorre-Beltrán, A. (2010). La investigación-acción: conocer y cambiar la práctica educativa [Action-research: knowing and changing educational practice] (1. ed., 10. reimpr). Barcelona: Graó.

Newman, M. (2018). Networks, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.

O’Carroll, C, Kamerlin, C., Brennan, N., Hyllseth, B., Kohl, U., O’Neill, G., &

Van Den Berg, R. (2017). Providing researchers with the skills and competencies they need to practise Open Science. Luxembourg: Luxembourg: European Commission - Publications Office of the European

Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_skills_wgreport_final.

pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none

Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). Retrieved July 19, 2019, from https://opensciencemooc.eu/

Owen, S. (2014). Teacher professional learning communities: Going beyond contrived collegiality toward challenging debate and collegial learning and professional growth. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 54, 54–77.

Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and teaching education 67, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review. Retrieved from https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1047

Riel, M., & Polin, L. (2004). Online learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments. In Barab, S.A., Kling, R. and J.H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 16–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Serres, M. (2013). Pulgarcita [Thumbelina]. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Stagg, A. (2017). The ecology of the open practitioner: a conceptual framework for open research. Open Praxis, 9(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.4.662

Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent: Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/ 10.1177%2F0022487109337280




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1024

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.