Factors for Success and Course Completion in Massive Open Online Courses through the Lens of Participant Types

Isa Bingol, Engin Kursun, Halil Kayaduman

Abstract


The main purpose of this study is to investigate the factors for success and course completion through the lens of participants in a Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) system implemented in Turkey. Thirty-two participants were selected on the basis of purposive sampling among 5000 enrolled users from 10 MOOCs, who were then classified into 3 types –lurking, moderately active, memorably active– based on their participation rate in the course activities. The data were collected via the use of two semi-structured interviews. According to the findings, the factors for success in MOOCs to the participants were divided into three categories: instructor effectiveness, course design, and personal factors. As to the factors for course completion, the categories identified were the instructor, course design, personal factors, technical issues, and affordability/clarity. The findings regarding success and course completion were discussed in detail and recommendations were provided to enhance participation in MOOCs.


Keywords


open and distance education; massive open online courses (MOOCs); success factors; course completion

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006

AtademiX (2017). AtademiX Hakkında. Retrieved from http://atademix.atauni.edu.tr

Aydemir, M., Çelik, E., Bingol, I., Çakmak-Karapınar, D., Kursun, E., & Karaman, S. (2016). İnternet üzerinden herkese açık kurs (İHAK) sağlama deneyimi: AtademiX. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 52-74.

Belanger, Y. & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC.

Bosker, R. J. (1999). Educational Science and International Assessment Studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.5.2.240.6944

Bozkurt, A. & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Satisfaction, Preferences and Problems of a MOOC Participants. In Proceedings of The Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) 2015 International Convention (pp. 35-41). 3-7 November 2015, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13-25.

Brooker, A., Corrin, L., De Barba, P., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3237

Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Arastirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/2

de Waard, I., Koutropoulos, A., Özdamar-Keskin, N., Abajian, S. C., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C. O., & Gallagher, M. S. (2011). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. In mLearn 2011. Beijing, China.

Demirci, N. (2014). What is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and What is promising us for learning?. A Review-evaluative Article about MOOCs. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 8(1), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed.2014.8.1.a10

Deshpande, A., & Chukhlomin, V. (2017). What Makes a Good MOOC: A Field Study of Factors Impacting Student Motivation to Learn. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1377513

DiSalvio, P. (2012). Pardon the disruption: Innovation changes how we think about higher education. New England Journal of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.nebhe.org/thejournal/disruptive-innovation-changing-how-we-think-about-higher-education

Esgice, M. (2015). Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Okul Bırakma Sebepleri, Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.

Göçer, A., & Deryakulu, D. (2004). Öğretmen yakınlığının öğrencilerin başarıları, tutumları ve güdülenme düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 40(40), 518-543.

Goldberg, L. R., Bell, E., King, C., O’Mara, C., McInerney, F., Robinson, A., & Vickers, J. (2015). Relationship between participants’ level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course. BMC medical education, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 16–7.

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001

Hill, P. (2013). Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A (Revised) Graphical View. Retrieved from https://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view

Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263

Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY.

Honeychurch, S., Bozkurt, A., Singh, L., & Koutropoulos, A. (2017). Learners on the periphery: lurkers as invisible learners. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(1), 192-212. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0012

İbicioğlu, H., & Antalyalı, Ö.L. (2005). Uzaktan eğitimin başarısında imkan, algı, motivasyon ve etkileşim faktörlerinin etkileri: Karşılaştırmalı bir uygulama. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 325-338.

Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133-160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651

Kassabian, D. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) at elite, early-adopter universities: Goals, progress, and value proposition. Published doctoral thesis. University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.

Kayaduman, H. (2020). Student interactions in a flipped classroom‐based undergraduate engineering statistics course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22239

Kiamanesh, A. R. (2004). Factors affecting Iranian students’ achievement in mathematics. Paper presented in the First IEA International Research Conference, Cyprus.

Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170-179). https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330

Koutropoulos, A., & Hogue, R. J. (2012). How to succeed in a MOOC-massive online open course. Retrieved from https://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1023/how-to-succeed-in-a-massive-online-open-course-mooc

Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y

Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, Y. (2014). MOOCs and Chinese Language Education. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 5(2), 49–65.

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Parslow, P. & Williams, S. (2014). Dropout: MOOC participants’ perspective. In: EMOOCs 2014, the Second MOOC European Stakeholders Summit, 10-12th February 2014, Lausanne, Switzerland, (pp. 95-100).

Loizzo, J. & Ertmer, P. (2015). A Preliminary Conceptual Framework of the Adult Learner Social Science MOOC Experience. Association for Educational Communication & Technology 2015 conference.

Lukeš, D. (2012). MOOC motivations and magnitudes: Reflections on the MOOC experience vs the MOOC drop out. Researchity–Exploring Open Research and Open Education. Retrieved from http://researchity.net/2012/08/18/mooc-motivations-and-magnitudes

Mason G.S., Shuman T.R., & Cook K. E. (2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behaviour, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009

Morrison, D. (2014). Three (BIG) Barriers to Student Participation in xMOOCs. Retrieved from https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2014/07/13/three-big-barriers-to-student-participation-in-xmoocs

Nistor, N., & Neubauer, K. (2010). From participation to dropout: Quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Computers & Education, 55(2), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.026

Norman, D. A. (1988). Gulf of Evaluation and Gulf of Execution. Retrieve from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-glossary-of-human-computer-interaction/gulf-of-evaluation-and-gulf-of-execution

Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 5825-5834.

Papanastasiou, C. (2000). Internal and external factors affecting achievement in mathematics: Some findings from TIMSS. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-491x(00)00002-x

Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors Influencing Adult Learners' Decision to Drop Out or Persist in Online Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217.

Patton, M. Q. (1997). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing Factors of Success and Failure in MOOC and General Analysis of Learner Behaviour. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.697

Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.

Seven, M. A., & Engin, A. O. (2008). Öğrenmeyi etkileyen faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2).

Smith, P., & Ragan, T. (2000). The impact of R. M. Gagné’s work on instructional theory. In Richey, R. (Ed.). Legacy of Robert M. Gagné (pp. 225-281). Retrieved from http://ibstpi.org/_dev/archived/backup/Products/pdf/chapter_6.pdf.

Soong, M. B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36(2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00044-0

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stephens, M., & Jones, K. M. (2014). MOOCs as LIS professional development platforms: Evaluating and refining SJSU's first not-for-credit MOOC. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 345-361.

Tatar, M. (2005). Öğretmen Beklentisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2). Retrieved from http://yyu.dergipark.gov.tr/yyuefd/issue/13720/166070

Vázquez, J. A. V., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. & Gónzalez, J. R. V. (2018). Motivation and Knowledge: Pre-Assessment and Post-Assessment of MOOC Participants from an Energy and Sustainability Project. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3489

Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs?. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17-30.

Wright, C. R. (2003). Criteria for evaluating the quality of online courses. Alberta Distance Education and Training Association, 16(2).

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri (6th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). MOOCs - A Review of the State-of-the-Art. In Proc. CSEDU 2014 conference, Vol. 3 (pp. 9-20).

Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education - A white paper. JISC CETIS (Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards). Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf.

Yukselturk, E. & Inan, F.A. (2006). Examining the Factors Affecting Student Dropout in an Online Certificate Program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3).

Zainuddin, Z. & Attaran, M. (2015). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670.

Zhou, J. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1067

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.