Exploring the Predictive Role of E-Learning Readiness and E-Learning Style on Student Engagement

Esin Ergün, Fatma Betül Kurnaz Adıbatmaz

Abstract


The aim of this study was to determine the factors predicting student engagement. The sample of the study consisted of 527 students from Karabuk University Distance Education Center. Independent variables of the study were e-learning style and online learning readiness. The data were analyzed using the stepwise multiple regression analysis. The findings revealed that students, who set a learning goal, can manage their time in line with this goal, put effort, organize their learning considering their needs, pay attention to learning situations or the learning object, prefer to work with visual elements, enjoy doing research, can remember easily and study with visuals that facilitate retrieval, prefer to work independently, take responsibility for their learning, and believe in their learning ability, have higher levels of engagement.


Keywords


Student engagement; online learning readiness; e-learning style

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Albayrak, A. S. (2006). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

Astin, A., W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ309521

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Pearson Education.

Beeland, W. (2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help? Retrieved from http://www.teachade.com/resources/support/5035b24ec2fbe.pdf

Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp. 75-86). Sydney: Ascilite.

Bryan, T., K., Lutte, R., Lee, J., O’Neil, P., Maher, C.S. & Hoflund, A. B. (2018). When do online education technologies enhance student engagement? A case of distance education at University of Nebraska at Omaha. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(2), 255-273. http://doi:10.1080/15236803.2018.1429817

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1-360.

Chakraborty, M., & Nafukho, F. M. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782-802. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2013-0123

Daniel, B., & Schwier, R. A. (2010). Analysis of Students’ Engagement and Activities in a Virtual Learning Community: A Social Network Methodology. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), 2(4), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvcsn.2010100103

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890707.pdf

Ergün, E., & Usluel, Y. K. (2015). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenci bağlılık ölçeği’nin türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.64661

Eunjoo, O. (2006). Current Practices in Blended Instruction. PhD Thesis. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee.

Finn, J. D. & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221

Floratos, N., Guasch, T. & Espasa, A. (2015). Recommendations on Formative Assessment and Feedback Practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs. Open Praxis, 7(2), 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.194

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gülbahar, Y. & Alper, A. (2014). Development of e-Learning Styles Scale for Electronic Environments. Education & Science, 39(171), 421-435. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/download/2078/654

Hampton, D., & Pearce, P. F. (2016). Student engagement in online nursing courses. Nurse Educator. Advance online publication, 41(6), 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000275

Hong, Y. & Gardner, L. (2018). An Exploration of Undergraduates’ Preparedness and Experiences in Blended Courses. Twenty-Second Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Japan.

Hung, M., L., Chou, C., Chen, C., H. & Own, Z., Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004

Inkelas, K. K., Szele ́nyi, K., Soldner, M., & Brower, A. M. (2007). National Study of Living- Learning Programs: 2007 Report of findings. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.livelearnstudy.net/additionalresources/reports.html

Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques. Ankara: Asil Publish.

Kaur, K., & Abas, Z., A. (2004). An assessment of e-learning readiness at Open University Malaysia. 1017-1022. Retrieved from http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/115/1/an_assessment.pdf

Kaymak-Demir, Z. & Horzum, B., M. (2013). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Öğrencilerinin Çevrimiçi Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeyleri, Algıladıkları Yapı ve Etkileşim Arasındaki İlişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri- Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1783-1797.

Knowles, M., S. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Association Press.

Levy, Y. (2008). An empirical development of critical value factors (CVF) of online learning activities: An application of activity theory and cognitive value theory. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1664-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.003

Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors’ adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education, 61(1), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.016

Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006) The Learning Styles, Expectations, and Needs of Online Students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.185-189

Parkes, M., Stein, S. & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002

Pedone, F. (2014). Learning styles and metacognition. Proceedings of the 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 1678-1687).

Piskurich, G. M. (Ed.) (2003). Preparing Learners for E-Learning. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Richardson, J., C., & Newby, T. (2006). The Role of Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3

Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging Web Technologies in Higher Education: A Case of Incorporating Blogs, Podcasts and Social Bookmarks in a Web Programming Course based on Students' Learning Styles and Technology Preferences. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 98–109. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f19/03c07d7960bcadf55e4b77e2cbf0f712120c.pdf

Saeed, S. & Zyngier, D. (2012). How Motivation Influences Student Engagement: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252- 267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252

Sakal, M. (2017). Çevrimiçi Öğrenmede Öğrencilerin Hazırbulunuşluk Düzeylerinin Demografik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Researches, 18(39), 81-102. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epod/issue/27273/287125

Schmeck, R., R., Geisler-Brenstein, E., & Cercy, S., P. (1991). Self- concept and Learning: The Revised Inventory of Learning Processes. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110310

Shukora, N., A, Tasira, Z, Meijdenb, H., V., & Harun, J. (2014). A Predictive Model to Evaluate Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4844-4853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1036

Skilling, K., Bobis, J. & Martin, A. J. (2020). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shift in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2

Song, L., & Hill, J., R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.1.3.pdf

Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Strachan, R. & Liyanage, L. (2015). Active Student Engagement: The Heart of Effective Learning. In P.C. Layne & P. Lake (Eds.), Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 255-274). Springer International Publishing,

Suarez-Orozco C., Pimentel, A. & Martin, M. (2009). The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111, 712-749. Retrieved from https://research.steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/004/293/TCR%202009.pdf

Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf

Vermunt, J., D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2

Walker, O., C., Greene, A., B. & Mansell, A., R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004

Yurdugül, H. & Alsancak, Sırakaya, D. (2013). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Hazır Bulunuşluluk Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 391-406. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2420




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1072

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.