Open and Distance Learner Engagement with Online Mediation Tools: An Activity Theory Analysis

Judy Corinne Noeline Pullenayegem, K. Radhika M. De Silva, Buddhini Gayathri Jayatilleke

Abstract


This paper presents the results of a study conducted to ascertain the extent to which participants studying in an open and distance learning context utilized the mediation tools provided in an Advanced Writing Skills course, conducted in a blended-learning mode in Sri Lanka. Sixty-four participants engaged in the online component of the writing course using the Process Approach. The course consisted of seven sessions; four addressing the stages of the Process Approach to writing an essay, and three practice sessions. Data were gathered from log-files of the Learning Management System, questionnaires, and interviews related to five mediation tools provided to learners. The data were analyzed utilizing Engeström’s activity theory framework (1987); with focus on the contradictions that emerged in the use of each tool. First, the contradictions that emerged in participants’ engagement with the tools is presented, secondly, the factors that need to be taken into account to ensure greater engagement.


Keywords


Mediation tools; Activity Theory; Contradictions; Open and Distance learning; Advanced writing skills; Blended-learning

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Aduayi-Akue, J., Lotchi, K., Parveen, S., Onatsu, T. & Pehkonen-Elmi, E. (2017). Motivation of online learners. JAMK Open Access Online Magazines, Evolving Pedagogy – Greetings from Finland. Retrieved from https://verkkolehdet.jamk.fi/ev-peda/2017/01/25/motivation-of-online- learners/

Aziz, S. M. (2003). Online quizzes for enhancing student learning in a first-year engineering course. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education. July 21–25, 2003 Valencia, Spain, 1-8. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228400601_Online_Quizzes_for_Enhancing_Student_Learning_in_a_First_Year_Engineering_Course

Benson, A., Lawler, C., Whitworth, A. (2008). Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00838

Birch, D. & Volkov, M. (2007). Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English second language (ESL) students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44502/

Brine, J. W., & Franken, M. (2006). Students' perceptions of a selected aspect of a computer mediated academic writing program: An activity theory analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 22(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1305

De Silva, R., & Devendra, D. (2015). Responding to English language needs of undergraduates: Challenges and constraints. OUSL Journal, 7, 1–24. http://doi.org/10.4038/ouslj.v7i0.7305

El Mansour, B., & Mupinga, D. M. (2007). Students' positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal, 41(1), 242-248. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101004

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf

Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004) Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning, 19, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051042000224743

Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00233.x

Gedera, D. S. P. (2014). Tool mediation and learner engagement: an Activity Theory perspective. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S-K. Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Proceedings ASCILITE, Dunedin 2014 (pp.42-48). Retrieved from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/dunedin2014/files/fullpapers/57-Gedera.pdf

Gedera, D. S. P., & Williams, P. J. (Eds.) (2016). Activity Theory in education research and practice. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2

Hin, L. C. B. (2011). Effect of incentivized online activities on e-learning. Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.040

Jayatilleke, B.G. & Gunawardena, C. (2016), Cultural perceptions of online learning transnational faculty perspectives, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0019

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby. G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 121-140. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13ResearchP121-140Jeffrey0460.pdf

Kuuti, K. (1996). Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research, In B. Nardi (ed.). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction. MIT Press (pp. 17-44). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.5417&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and He Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press.

Leung, S. (2013). English proficiency and participation in online discussion for learning. Paper presented at IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013). Fort Worth, TX, Oct 22-24, 2013. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562207.pdf

Mahlangu, V.P. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly of distance learning in higher education. Trends in E-learning, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75702

Mason, R. B. (2011). Student engagement with, and participation in an E-forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258–268. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52346/

Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. BJET British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00401.x

Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Harland, J., & Warburton, G. (2011). How active are students in online discussion forums? In J. Hamer and M. de Raadt (Eds.). Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (CRPIT), 114. Proceedings in 13th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2011), Perth, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Quimby, J. L., & O'Brien, K. M. (2004). Predictors of student and career decision-making self-efficacy among nontraditional college women. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2004.tb00949.x

Seethamraju, R. (2014). Effectiveness of using online discussion forum for case study analysis. Education Research International 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/589860

Suppasetseree, S., & Nutprapha, K. D. (2010). The Use of Moodle for teaching and learning English at tertiary level in Thailand. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(6), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i06/42964

Topham, P. (2015). Older adults in their first year at university: Challenges, resources and support. Bristol, UK: University of the West of England. Retrieved from https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/831416/older-adult-students-in-their-first-year-at-university-challenges-resources-and-support

Vidanapathirana, U. (2006). Language barrier in a multi-lingual environment: making sense of issues and problems from the perspective of students of the BA degree in Social Sciences (BASS). Paper presented at 4th Pan Commonwealth on Achieving Development Goals: Innovation, Learning, Collaboration and Foundations. 30 October - 3 November, 2006, Ocho Rios, Jamaica.

Vidanapathirana, U., & Gamini, L. P. S. (2009). Medium of instruction, language proficiency and learner profiles: Impact of English proficiency on the performance of learners following the BA Degree in Social Sciences. OUSL Journal, 5, 41-59. http://doi.org/10.4038/ouslj.v5i0.2142

Vygotsky, L. S. (1977). The development of higher psychological functions, Soviet Psychology, 15(3), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405150360

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yukselturk, E. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2) 24-32. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ897999.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1129

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.