Eliminating educational Inequality through e-learning: the case of Virtual University of Pakistan

Aisha Muhammad Din, Sadia Jabeen


This study aims at examining the role of e-learning in combating the issues of inequality in terms of access and quality in the field of higher education in Pakistan. The education system in Pakistan is mainly characterized by educational disparity. The standard of education is directly proportional to the investment students make in the form of registration and fees. Another important issue is the non-availability of reputed educational institutes in small towns and villages. Unfortunately, very few people from rural areas have access to quality higher education. Virtual University of Pakistan through its distance e-learning mode has come forward to break this trend in social inequality by providing equal educational opportunities to all social classes through its affordable fee structure yet ensuring high standards of teaching. For the purpose of testing these assumptions with reference to a Virtual education system, the existing patterns of enrollment, income structure of guardian/students, professors’ profile, and alumni’s profile data were obtained from IT department of Virtual University of Pakistan. Descriptive statistics and independent sample t-test were used for data analysis. It could be ascertained from the conclusion that Virtual University of Pakistan has successfully broken the chain of educational inequality through its e-learning mode. In case of virtual education, discrimination on the basis of gender, social class and location, is no more applicable. The findings of current research have invalidated the existence of inequality in the e-learning system.


education, e-learning, inequality, Virtual University of Pakistan (VUP)

Full Text:



Abdon, B. R.; Ninomiya, S. & Raab, R. T. (2007). eLearning in Higher Education Makes Its Debut in Cambodia: Implications of the Provincial Business Education Project. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/333

ADB. (2010). The Rise of Asia’s Middle Class. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/news/videos/rise-asias-middle-class

Anderson, B. (2005). New Zealand: Is online education a highway to the future? In A. A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.), Global perspectives on e-learning: Rhetoric and reality (pp.163-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ball, S. J. (2004). Class strategies and the education market: The middle classes and social advantage. Routledge.

Bari, F. & Sultana, N. (2011). Inequality in Education. Foundation Open Society Institute, Pakistan.

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2013). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Haymarket Books.

Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2005). Conclusions. In A. A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.), Global perspectives on e-learning: Rhetoric and reality (pp. 257-259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

CIA. (2013). The World Fact Book 2011-2012. Retrieved January 13, 2014 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

Ellis, P.D. (2009). Thresholds for interpreting effect sizes. Retrieved January 13, 2014 from http://www.polyu.edu.hk/mm/effectsizefaqs/thresholds_for_interpreting_effect_sizes2.html

Greaves, N.; Hill, D. & Maisuria, A. (2007). Embourgeoisment, Immiseration, Commodification—Marxism Revisited: a Critique of Education in Capitalist Systems. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/534

Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The information society, 16(3), 217-232. Retrieved from http://potoulis.edc.uoc.gr/hy302/texts/information%20technology%20and%20social%20change.pdf

Lawler, S. (2005). Disgusted subjects: The making of middle‐class identities. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 429-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00560.x

Leary, J. & Berge, Z. (2006). Trends and challenges of eLearning in national and international agricultural development. International Journal of Education and Developement using ICT, 2(2). Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=179&layout=html

Lepi, K. (2013). How Countries Began Trying Distance Learning? Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://www.edudemic.com/

Liu, G. & Hwang, G. (2009). A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: Towards context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E1-E9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x

McLuhan, E. (1996). The Source of the Term ‘Global Village’. McLuhan Studies, 2. Retrieved from http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/mcluhan-studies/v1_iss2/1_2art2.htm

Moll, I. (2004). Curriculum responsiveness: The anatomy of a concept. In H. Griessel (Ed.). Curriculum responsiveness: Case studies in higher education, (pp. 1-20). Pretoria: South African Universities Vice-Chancellors’ Associations.

Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British journal of educational studies, 54(3), 288-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00351.x

Rosenberg, M. (2008). Building a learning Culture. ELearning! Magazine. Retrieved January 13, 2014 from http://www.2elearning.com/

Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. Routledge.

UNESCO. (2004). Metasurvey on the use of technologies in Education. Retrieved from http://www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ict/Metasurvey/introduction.pdf

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.4.126


  • There are currently no refbacks.