Access under siege: Are the gains of open education keeping pace with the growing barriers to University access?

Don Olcott Jr

Abstract


Traditional and affordable access to a university education is under siege from all sides. National realpolitiks and global economic downturns have driven open education into the mainstream to stand against educational elitism, the growing digital divide, and to support the core values that give education its fundamental credence as a human right. Indeed, open is good—open with measurable impacts is even better. In the final analysis, the future of open education is at a crossroads that must be driven by those core values that define education as an essential human right with a commitment to expanding access and strengthening academic quality.


Keywords


Open education; access; distance learning; quality assurance; OERs; human rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butcher, N., Kanwar, A. (Ed.), & Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (Ed.). (2011). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning (COL) and Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/oerBasicGuide

Cape Town Open Education Declaration. (2007). Cape Town Open Education Declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration

Conole, G. (2010, January 25). Defining open educational practices (OEP) [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://e4innovation.com/?p=373

Conole, G. C., & Ehlers, U.-D. (2010, May). Open educational practices: Unleashing the power of OER. Paper presented at the UNESCO Workshop on OER, Windhoek, Namibia.

De Langen, F.H.T. & Bitter-Rijkema, M.E. (2012). Positioning the OER business model for open education. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2012 (I), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?article=483

Dickens, C. (1869). A Tale of Two Cities. New York: Hurd and Houghton.

McAndrew, P. (2010). Defining openness: Updating the concept of ‘open’ for a connected world. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 10, 1–13.

McGreal, R. (2012). The need for Open Educational Resources for ubiquitous learning. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing (PerCom) Conference 2012, Lugano, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3169

McNamara, T. (2012). Open Education: Emergence and Identity. Retrieved from http://oh-institute.org/external_resources/pub/McNamara-OpenEd_Emergence_Identity-CC-by.pdf

Olcott, D. J. (2009). Going global: Trends in cross border higher education for ODL. China Journal of Open Education Research, 15(4): 4–9. JOER authorized the English translation to be published by The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

Olcott, D. (2012). OER perspectives: Emerging issues for universities, Distance Education, 33(2), 283–290. Published by the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.700561

Peters, M. A. (2008). The History and Emergent Paradigm of Open Education. In M. A. Peters & R. Britez. Open Education and Education for Openness. (pp. 3–16). Rotterdam & Taipei: Sense Publishers.

Smith, M.S. and Casserly, C.M. (2006). The promise of Open Educational Resources. Change, 38(5), 8–17.

UNESCO/Commonwealth of Learning (COL). (2011). Guidelines for open educational resources (OER) in higher education. Paris, France: UNESCO and Vancouver, Canada: COL.

Vincent-Lancrin, S. & S. Pfotenhauer. (2012). Guidelines for quality assurance in cross-border higher education: Where do we stand? OECD Education Working Papers, No. 70, OECD Publishing.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.14

Refbacks