Open Data as Open Educational Resources: Towards Transversal Skills and Global Citizenship

Javiera Atenas, Leo Havemann, Ernesto Priego


Open Data is the name given to datasets which have been generated by international organisations, governments, NGOs and academic researchers, and made freely available online and openly-licensed. These datasets can be used by educators as Open Educational Resources (OER) to support different teaching and learning activities, allowing students to gain experience working with the same raw data researchers and policy-makers generate and use. In this way, educators can facilitate students to understand how information is generated, processed, analysed and interpreted.

This paper offers an initial exploration of ways in which the use of Open Data can be key in the development of transversal skills (including digital and data literacies, alongside skills for critical thinking, research, teamwork, and global citizenship), enhancing students’ abilities to understand and select information sources, to work with, curate, analyse and interpret data, and to conduct and evaluate research. This paper also presents results of an exploratory survey that can guide further research into Open Data-led learning activities. Our goal is to support educators in empowering students to engage, critically and collaboratively, as 21st century global citizens.


Open Data; Open Educational Resources; Research based learning; Critical Thinking; Global Citizenship; Higher Education

Full Text:



Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Arzberger, P., Schroeder, P., Beaulieu, a, Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., … Wouters, P. (2004). Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development. Data Science Journal, 3 (November), 135–152.

Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2015, March 9). The 21st Century’s Raw Material: Using Open Data as Open Educational Resources. Open Education Working Group. Open Knowledge Foundation. Retrieved from

Baker, K. S., & Duerr, R. E. (2015). Authentic Learning in the Research Data Curation Classroom. In iConference 2015 Proceedings (p. 4). Retrieved from

Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261–275.

Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. (1998). Doing With Understanding: Lessons From Research on Problem and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3), 271–311.

Beetham, H., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2011). Thriving in the 21st century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age. Retrieved from

Bindé, J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from

Borne, K. D., Jacoby, S., Carney, K., Connolly, a., Eastman, T., Raddick, M. J., … Wallin, J. (2009). The Revolution in Astronomy Education: Data Science for the Masses, (March), 12. Retrieved from

Brabazon, T. (2001, June 4). Internet teaching and the administration of knowledge. First Monday, 6(6). Retrieved from

Bradley, J. C., Lancashire, R. J., Lang, A. S., & Williams, A. J. (2009). The spectral game: Leveraging open data and crowdsourcing for education. Journal of Cheminformatics, 1(1), 1–10.

Castells, M. (2000). The Network Society. University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Davies, T. (2010). Open data, democracy and public sector. Interface, 1–47. Retrieved from

Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. a P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.

Doucette, L., & Fyfe, B. (2013). Drowning in Research Data: Addressing Data Management Literacy of Graduate Students. Imagine, Innovate, Inspire: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2013 Conference, 165–171. Retrieved from

Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The Power of Problem-based Learning: A Practical “how To” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Evans, T., & Nation, D. (1993). Reforming Open and Distance Education: Critical Reflections from Practice. Psychology Press.

Eve, M. (2013). Before the law: open access, quality control and the future of peer review. London. Retrieved from

Fischer, G., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities. International Journal on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 9–40. Retrieved from

Gilardi, S., & Lozza, E. (2009). Inquiry-Based Learning and Undergraduates’ Professional Identity Development: Assessment of a Field Research-Based Course. Innovative Higher Education, 34(4), 245–256.

Gurstein, M. B. (2011). Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, 16(2).

Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the University: new relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, 67–78. Retrieved from balance healey.pdf

Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–267. Retrieved from

Huijboom, N. & Van de Broek, T. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12, 4-16. Retrevied from

Johnson, J. A. (2014). From Open Data to Information Justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(4), 263–274.

Kasl, E., Marsick, V., & Dechant, K. (1997). Teams as Learners: A Research-Based Model of Team Learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(2), 227–246.

Kotzé, T. G., & Plessis, P. J. Du. (2003). Students as “co-producers” of education: a proposed model of student socialisation and participation at tertiary institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(4), 186–201.

Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556.

Mazón, J.-N., Lloret, E., Gómez, E., Aguilar, A., Mingot, I., Pérez, E., & Quereda, L. (2014). Reusing open data for learning database design. In Computers in Education (SIIE), 2014 International Symposium (pp. 59–64).

Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: Open data means better science. PLoS Biology, 9(12), 1–4.

Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2009). The student as producer: reinventing the student experience in higher education. In The future of higher education: policy, pedagogy and the student experience (pp. 192–210). Retrieved from

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. T. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Wiley.

OECD. (2009). Focus on Citizens. (J. Bourgon, Ed.) OECD Studies on Public Engagement. OECD Publishing.

Papert, S. (1987). Computer Criticism vs . Technocentric Thinking. Educational Research, 16(1), 22–30. Retrieved from,%20technocentric%20thinking.pdf

Piorun, M., Kafel, D., Leger-Hornby, T., Najafi, S., Martin, E., Colombo, P., & LaPelle, N. (2012). Teaching Research Data Management: An Undergraduate/Graduate Curriculum. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(1), 46–50.

Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. OECD Definition and Selection of Competencies Final Report, 1–20. Retrieved from

Schield, M. (2004). Information literacy, statistical literacy and data literacy. IASSIST Quarterly, 28, 6-11.

Silberman, C. (1973). The open classroom reader. New York: Random House.

Smith, K. (2008). Embedding enterprise education into the curriculum at a research-led university. Education + Training, 50(8/9), 713–724.

Soder, R., Goodlad, J. I., & McMannon, T. J. (2001). Developing democratic character in the young. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. The Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211. Retrieved from

Uhlir, P. F., & Schröder, P. (2007). Open Data for Global Science. Data Science Journal, 6, OD36–OD53.

UNESCO. (2015). Transversal competencies in education Policy and Practice. (S. Strandberg, Ed.). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from

Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to Think Like a Physicist. American Journal of Physics, 59, 891.

Wagner, G. E. (2014). Research-Based Learning. In C. L. Quave (Ed.), Innovative Strategies for Teaching in the Plant Sciences (pp. 61–82). New York, NY: Springer New York.

Wallman, K. K. (1993). Enhancing Statistical Literacy: Enriching Our Society. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421), 1–8.

Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(July 2015), 3–46. Retrieved from

Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46(1), 71–95.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Willems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity considerations for open educational resources in the glocalization of education. Distance Education, 33(2), 185-199.

Worthy, B. (2015). Who is using all this government open data? Open Data Institute News, 23 July 2015. Retrieved from

Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 411–427.

Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Alibaks, R. S., & Sheikh_Alibaks, R. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of eGovernment, 10(2), 156–172. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.