Distance Education Examination Management in a Lowly Resourced North-Eastern Region of Zambia: A Phenomenological Approach

Francis Simui, Henry Chibale, Boniface Namangala

Abstract


This paper focuses on the management of distance education examination in a lowly resourced North-Eastern region of Zambia. The study applies Hermeneutic Phenomenology approach to generate and make sense of the data. It is the lived experiences of 2 invigilators and 66 students purposively selected that the study draws its insights from. Meaning within the generated data is elicited using the Chaos theory. Emerging from this study is a multiplicity of ingredients needed to effectively manage distance education examinations in a chaotic environment. The need for visionary leadership with a shared understanding of institutional purpose, the need for motivated staff with creativity and innovation and the need for effective communication are all vital ingredients needed to manage examinations. In conclusion, we now know that amidst chaos lay opportunities for innovation and creativity in terms of new strategies for managing distance education. To this extent, chaos should be treasured and not censured.


Keywords


Examinations; chaos theory; Distance Education; University of Zambia

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Altun, S. A. (2001). Kaos ve yönetim. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 28, 451–469.

Altındağ, E. & Kazdal, Ö.S. (2014). The Effects of Chaos Theory, Six Sigma and Blue Ocean Approach on Firm Performance at Family Firms: An Empirical Study in Turkey. American Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061403501

Brown H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Bryman, A. (2008). The end of the paradigm wars? In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman & J. Brannen (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods (pp. 13–25). London: Sage.

Chaudhary, S. V. S. & Dey, N. (2013). Assessment in Open and Distance Learning System (ODL): A Challenge. Open Praxis, 5(3), 207–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.3.65

Dabaj, F. (2011). Analysis of Communication Barriers to Distance Education: A Review Study. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.ojcmt.net/articles/11/111.pdf

Denscombe, M. (2002). Ground Rules for Good Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Ertürk, A. (2012). Kaos Kuramı: Yönetim Ve Eğitimdeki Yansımaları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 849–868. Retrieved from http://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/20_3/20_3_9.pdf

Finch, A. (2004). Complexity and systems theory: Implications for the EFL teacher /researcher. Journal of Asia TEFL. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://www.finchpark.com/arts/complexity-and-systems-EFL.pdf

Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. University of Southern Mississippi. Retrieved from http://www.tcom.ohiou.edu/ouln/Barriers to Learning in Distance Education.htm

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

Gökmen, A. (2009). Kaos Teorisinin Genel Bir Değerlendirmesi. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1), 61–79.

Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin u. Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd edition) (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Halling, S. (2008). Intimacy, transcendence, and psychology: Closeness and openness in everyday life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hunte, S. E. (2013). Managing Education at a Distance: An Interim Review of Instructional Project Management at the University of West Indies Open Campus. International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, 27(2). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/844

Ibara, E.C. (2008). Administering Examinations for Quality Control in Distance Education: The National Open University of Nigeria Perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education - TOJDE, 9(3), 7–11. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/419-published.pdf

Kendirli, S. (2006). Portföy Yönetiminde Kaos Teoremi. Journal of İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Dergisi, 171–180.

Lorenzen, M. (2005). Chaos Theory and Education. Retrieved in September 7, 2016 from http://www.libraryreference.org/chaos.html

MacNeil, W. & Topping, K. (2007). Crisis management in schools: Evidence-based prevention. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 7(2), 64–94. Retrieved from http://www.cred.unisa.edu.au/jee/Papers/JEEVol7No2/MacNeil.pdf

Mafa, O. & Gudhlanga, E.S. (2012). Examination Management as a Way of Achieving Quality Assurance in ODL Institutions: The Case of Zimbabwe Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education - TOJDE, 13(2), 147–157. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/760-published.pdf

Mayring, P.H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Background, recent developments and software solution. Retreieved from http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517

Mehralizadeh, Y. & Hosseinzadeh, A. (2007). Reengineering the Management of Educational Change in the light of Chaos Theory? Quarterly Journal of Human Development, 1(2).

Moore, M.G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic454495.files/moore.pdf

Perreault, H., Waldman, L., Alexander, M., & Zhao, J. (2002). Overcoming Barriers to Successful Delivery of Distance Courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 313–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599681

Reigeluth, C. M. (2004). Chaos theory and the sciences of complexity: Foundations for transforming education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b26b/db3c9564a3c542225401e42d9db83a2cd743.pdf

Siaciwena R. (2006). Challenges of a dual mode institution: The case of the University of Zambia (UNZA). Conference Presentation. The Fourth Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Retrieved from http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.php?id=112

Schoenberg, A. (2005). Do crisis plans matters? A new perspective on leading during a crisis. Public Relations Quarterly, 50(1), 2–6. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/17249012/do-crisis-plans-matter-new-perspective-leading-during-crisis

Tait, A. (2000). Planning student support in open and distance learning. Open Learning, 15(3), 287–299. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713688410

University of Zambia (2009). Student Handbook. Lusaka: UNZA - Institute of Distance Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.442

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.