Implementing the First Cross-border Professional Development Online Course through International E-mentoring: Reflections and Perspectives

Buddhini Gayathri Jayatilleke, Geetha Udayanganie Kulasekara, Malinda Bandara Kumarasinha, Charlotte Nirmalani Gunawardena

Abstract


This research paper discusses the accomplishments, issues, and challenges experienced by Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL) academics when offering the first cross-border professional development online course to train online tutors and mentors. The course was delivered exclusively online and facilitated by OUSL academics and e-mentors from the USA. The course was comprised of 30 participants: 9 from Pakistan, 10 from Mauritius and 11 from Sri Lanka. This qualitative study is based on reflections of both faculty and participants. Data were collected using reflections and informal anecdotal records of the three OUSL academics and self-reflection instruments (pre, mid and final) administered to participants, and reflective journal entries made by participants. Participants’ views were triangulated with the reflections of the OUSL academics to validate the results. While there were many accomplishments in the design and delivery of the course, the findings revealed that there were many challenges in implementing the course: pedagogical, organizational and technological aspects in particular. The paper provides recommendations to address such challenges when offering cross-border online courses in the future.


Keywords


Reflective practice; Professional development; Cross-border; e-mentoring, Instructional design; Online learning

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Andersson, A. (2008). Seven major challenges for e-learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT (IJEDICT), 4(3), 45-62. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=472&layout=html

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-7.

Aydin, C. H. (2005). Turkish mentors’ perception of roles, competencies and resources for online learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education–TOJDE, 6(3), 58–80. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde19/index.htm

Berge, Z. (1995). The role of the instructor /facilitator. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22-30.

Boyd, D. & Fales, A. (1983). Reflective learning: key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99-117.

Branford, J., Vye, N., Bateman, H., Brophy, S. & Roselli, B. (2004). Vanderbilt’s AMIGO project: Knowledge of how people learn enters cyberspace. In T. M. Duffy & J. R. Kirkley (Eds.). Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education (pp. 209-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M. & Anzul, M. (1997). On writing Qualitative Research: Living by words. London: Falmer Press.

Ettinger, A.; Holton, V. & Blass, E. (2005). E-learner experiences: learning from the pioneers. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(6), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850510617550

Fleck, J. (2012). Blended learning and learning communities: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 398-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621711211219059

Frechette, C., Layne, L.C. & Gunawardena, C. N. (2014). Accounting for culture in Instructional Design. In I. Jung & C. N. Gunawardena C. N. (Eds.). Culture and Online Learning: Global Perspectives and Research (pp. 54-66). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/477/1012

Gunawardena, C. N., Flor, N. V., Gomez, D., & Sanchez, D. (2016). Analyzing social construction of knowledge Online by Employing Interaction Analysis, Learning Analytics, and Social Network Analysis. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 35-60.

Gunawardena, C. N.; Ortegano‐Layne, L.; Carabajal, K.; Frechette, C.; Lindemann, K. & Jennings, B. (2006). New Model, New Strategies: Instructional design for building online wisdom communities. Distance Education, 27(2), 217-232.

Hough, G., McNaught, C. & Van Schaik, L. (1998). Developing a faculty plan for flexible delivery for the next five years – and how to get there. In Corderoy, R.M. (ed). FlexibilITy: The Next Wave? Proceedings of ASCILITE’98, University of Wollongong (pp. 339-346).

Jarvis, P. (1992). Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Education Today, 12(3), 174-181.

Ku, H. & Lohr, L.L. (2003). A case study of Chinese students’ attitude toward their first online

learning experience. Education Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 94-102.

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Leeds, B. (2014). Temporal experiences of e-learning by distance learners. Education+Training, 56(2/3), 179-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2012-0114

Patton, Q. M., (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd Ed.). Newsbury Park, London: Sage Publications Inc.

Roberts, E., & Lund, J. (2007). Exploring eLearning community in a global postgraduate programme. In R. Andrews, & C. Haythornwaite (eds). The Sage Handbook of eLearning Research (pp. 487-503). London: Sage.

Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Stuckey, B. & Barab, S. (2007). New conceptions for community design. In R. Andrews & H. Caroline (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 439-465). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Taylor, P. (1998). Institutional change in uncertain times: lone ranging is not enough. Studies in Higher Education, 23(3), 269-278.

Varvel, V.E. (2007, Spring). Master online teacher competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring101/varvel101.htm

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Shteiner, S. Scribner & Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.461

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.