Current Status of the MOOC Movement in the World and Reaction of the Turkish Higher Education Institutions

Cengiz Hakan Aydin

Abstract


This manuscript intends to elaborate the current status of MOOC movement in the world and to reveal the results of a survey study in which the Turkish higher education institutions’ reactions to this movement was investigated. The survey was actually a part of a larger survey study that, as a deliverable of the EU funded HOME project, was conducted to contribute to the literature by providing an insight about European perspectives on MOOCs, to gain a better understanding of the strategic reasons why a higher education institution is or isn’t involved in MOOCs, and to compare these reasons with the results of similar studies in U.S. After a brief background and history of MOOC movement, following sections of the manuscript present the details (methodology and results) of the survey study on the Turkish HE institutions’ strategies regarding adaptation of MOOCs. The final part of the manuscript consists of discussions and conclusions drawn in the light of the results of the study.


Keywords


MOOC; adaptation; Turkey; Higher Education; institutional strategy; online education

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Allen, I.E, & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group Report. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf

Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group Report. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf

Allen, I.E. & Seaman. J. (2016). Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf

Bang, J., Dalsgaard, C., Kjaer, A., & Donovan, M.M. (2016). MOOCs in higher education – opportunities and threats. Conference Proceedings of the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference: Enhancing European Higher Education: Opportunities and Impact of New Mods of Teaching (pp. 543-553). Netherlands: EADTU.

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media Education, 3. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/

Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., & Colucci, E. (2014). E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions: Results of a mapping survey conducted in October-December 2013. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publication/e-learning_survey.sflb.ashx

Hancer, A. (2016, May 15). Personal interview.

Herman, R. (2012). The MOOCs are coming. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(2), 1-3.

HOME (2014). Higher education Online: MOOCs the European way. Retrieved from http://home.eadtu.eu/

Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2014. EADTU. Retrieved from http://www.eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdf

Jansen, D., Schuwer, R., Teixeira, A., & Aydin, H. (2015). Comparing MOOC adoption strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME project survey. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 116-136. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2154

Kim, B. (2015). What do we know about MOOCs? In B. Kim. (ed.). MOOCs and Educational Challenges around Asia and Europe (pp. 3-7). Seoul: KNOU Press.

Latchem, C., Simsek, N., Cakir, O., Torkul, O., Cedimoglu, I., & Altunkopru, A. (2009). Are we there yet? A progress report from three Turkish university pioneers in distance education and e-learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/686/1220

OpenupEd (2014). Definition massive open online courses (MOOCs). Retrieved from http://www.openuped.eu/images/docs/Definition_Massive_Open_Online_Courses.pdf

OpenupEd (2016). About OpenupEd. Retrieved from http://www.openuped.eu/

Salar, H.C. (2013). Readiness of higher education faculty and students for open and distance learning. An unpublished dissertation. Eskisehir: Anadolu University Social Sciences Institute.

Shah, D. (2016, May 13). Less Experimentation, More Iteration: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2015. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2015

Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education? In R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, & S. Marshall. (Eds). Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice (pp. 5-16). Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.

Straumsheim, C. (2017, February 14). The British MOOC invasion. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/02/14/british-mooc-provider-futurelearn-expands-us.

TEPAV (2013, November). Turkey national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. A report prepared by the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey (TEPAV) and the British Council. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/sites/default/files/turkey_national_needs_assessment_of_state_school_english_language_teaching.pdf

Velciu, M. (2014). Recognition of prior learning by competences' validation in selected European countries. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 6(1), 217-222.

Walton, M. (2016, February 10). Welcoming 3 million people to FutureLearn. Retrieved from https://about.futurelearn.com/blog/welcoming-3-million-people-to-futurelearn




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.463

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.