Higher Education Lecturers’ Lived Experience of Going Public in MOOCs

Ulf Olsson

Abstract


Academics in higher education are used to having their research publications reviewed and openly scrutinized. Teaching in higher education has traditionally been an individual academic’s activity that has taken place in a closed classroom. However, the introduction of open education, particularly massive open online courses (MOOCs) has challenged this. In MOOCs, lectures are recorded and made public for thousands of course participants to view. This study investigates, via semi-structured interviews, how 20 lecturers of 10 MOOCs at six Swedish Universities have experienced this. All have joined the projects voluntarily, but a few have done so with some ambivalence. For them, standing in front of the camera, publishing material and, to some extent, losing control of the course content was scary at the beginning of the projects. Overall, the lecturers overcame this and thought that it was a good opportunity to reach many students, as well as a way to keep up with the changing requirements for teaching in higher education.


Keywords


MOOCs; Open education; Open Teaching; Openness; Higher Education

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Cormier, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Proposal for a Conceptual Framework for Educators to Describe and Design MOOCs Describe and Design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-020-01-0006

Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered - Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Boyer, E. L., Moser, D., Ream, T. C., & Braxton, J. M. (2016). Scholarship Reconsidered Priorities of the Professoriate Expanded Edition. Jossey-Bass Wiley.

Bozkurt, A., Keskin, N. O., & Waard, I. de. (2016). Research Trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Theses and Dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami Wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287

Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (second ed.). London: SAGE.

Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, September(3), 65–77.

Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, (January).

Gregory, M. S.-J., & Lodge, J. M. (2015). Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Education, 36(2),1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056

Hanson, J. (2009). Displaced but not replaced: the impact of e-learning on academic identities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903186774

Janssen, M., Nyström Claesson, A., & Lindqvist, M. (2016). Design and Early Development of a MOOC on “Sustainability in Everyday Life”: Role of the Teachers. In W. Leal Filho & S. Nesbit (Eds.), New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 113–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8

Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112

Kilis, S., Gülbahar, Y., & Rapp, C. (2016). Exploration of Teaching Preferences of Instructors’ use of Social Media. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 19(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0001

Kolowich, S. (2013, March 18). The Professors Behind the MOOC Hype. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12277

Lang, F., Zhang, S., Li, S., & Sun, G. (2016). Academic Management and Analysis Method of MOOC. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 9(11), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijhit.2016.9.11.20

McNaughton, S. M., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669

Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2016). In Search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a Definition and a Framework to Increase Openness Adoption Among University Educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2736/3974

Pundak, D., & Dvir, Y. (2014). Engineering College Lecturers Reluctance to Adopt Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0014

Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.42

Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14395

Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69.

Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the Digital University: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Retrieved from http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf

Torrisi-Steele, G., & Drew, S. (2013). The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: The need for better understanding of academic blended practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.786720

Weller, M. (2014). The Battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bam

Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & Mary, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature. In M. Dunleavy & C. Dede (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 735–745). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.589

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.