Opening teaching landscapes: The importance of quality assurance in the delivery of open educational resources

Javiera Atenas, Leo Havemann, Ernesto Priego


Scholars are increasingly being asked to share teaching materials, publish in open access journals, network in social media, and reuse open educational resources (OER). The theoretical benefits of Open Educational Practices (OEP) have become understood in the academic community but thus far, the use of OER has not been rapidly adopted. We aim to understand the challenges academics face with in attempting to adopt OEP, and identify whether these are related to or stem from the functionalities afforded by current repositories of OER (ROER). By understanding what academics and experts consider good practices, we can develop guidelines for quality in the development of ROER. In this article we present the findings from a study surveying academics using OER and experts who develop and/or work with ROER. We conclude by suggesting a framework to enhance the development and quality of ROER.


Open Educational Resources; Repositories; Quality Assurance; Open Educational Practices

Full Text:



Alevizou, P. (2012). Open to interpretation?: productive frameworks for understanding audience engagement with OER. Cambridge 2012: Innovation and Impact – Openly Collaborating to Enhance Education, a joint meeting of OER12 and OpenCourseWare Consortium Global 2012, 16-18 April 2012, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from

Anderson, T. (2009). ALT-C Keynote. Slideshare. Retrieved from

Andrade, A., Caine, A. & Carneiro, R. (2011). Beyond OER–Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices: OPAL Report 2011. Retrieved from

Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital Libraries. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.

Arnold, P. (2011). Open educational resources or closed learning management systems? –The Challenge of Designing ICT Support for Learning Communities in Higher Education. The Journal Of Community Informatics, 6(3). Retrieved from

Backall, L. (2007). Open educational resources and practices. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(june 2007), 63-81. Retrieved from

Barker, E. & Ryan, B. (2003). The Higher Level Skills for Industry Repository, 1-5. Retrieved from

Bissell, A. (2009). Permission granted: open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 97-106.

Borgman, C. (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.

Browne, T., Holding, R., Howell, A. & Rodway-Dyer, S. (2010). The challenges of OER to Academic Practice. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2010(01), 1-15. Retrieved from

Carpenter, J. (1999). What makes a digital librarian? A critical analysis of the management culture needed for effective digital library development. London: British Library Research and Innovation Centre, Report 174.

Clements, K. I. & Pawlowski, J. M. (2012). User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4-14.

Davis, H. C., Carr, L. A., Hey, J., Howard, Y., Millard, D., Morris, D. & White, S. (2010). Bootstrapping a culture of sharing to facilitate open educational resources. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(2), 96-109.

Deegan, M. & Tanner, S. (2002). Digital futures. Strategies for the Information Age. London:

Library Association Publishing.

Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Retrieved from〈=en

Ehlers, U. & Conole, G. C. (2010). Open Educational Practices: Unleashing the power of OER 2 . Defining Open Education Practice. Retrieved from

Ferguson, R., & Shum, S. B. (2012). Towards a Social Learning Space for Open Educational Resources. In A. Okada, T. Connolly, & P. Scott (Eds.) Collaborative Learning 2.0: Open Educational Resources (pp. 309-327). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of Open Education. Retrieved from

International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) (n.d.). Open Educational Practices. Retrieved 30th July 2013 from

Jacobi, R. & Woert, N. van der. (2012). Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2012. Special Interest Group Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from OER 2012_10042012 %28ENGELS LR%29.pdf

Kanwar, A., Kodhandaraman, B. & Umar, A. (2010). Toward Sustainable Open Education Resources: A Perspective From the Global South. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 65-80.

Kenney, A. & Rieger, O. (2000). Moving Theory into Practice. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.

Larsen, K. & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2005). The impact of ICT on tertiary education: advances and promises. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Directorate for Education / Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved from

McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. Retrieved from

McGreal, R. (2011). Open Educational Resource Repositories: An Analysis. Athabasca: Athabasca University, Ed. Retrieved from Educational Resource.pdf

Misra, P. (2013). Pedagogical quality enrichment in OER based courseware: Guiding principles. Open Praxis, 5(2), 123-134.

OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from

Olcott, D. (2012). OER perspectives: emerging issues for universities. Distance Education, 33(2), 283-290. Retrieved from

Pawlowski, J. M. & Hoel, T. (2012). Towards a Global Policy for Open Educational Resources: The Paris OER Declaration and its Implications. White paper, version 0.2. Finland. Retrieved from

Pegler, C. (2012). Herzberg, hygiene and the motivation to reuse: Towards a three-factor theory to explain motivation to share and use OER. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012, 1-18. Retrieved from

Petrides, L. & Nguyen, L. (2008). Open educational resources: inquiring into author use and reuse. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 98-117. Retrieved from

Richter, T. & Ehlers, U. D. (2010). Barriers and Motivators for Using Open Educational Resources in Schools. Open ED, (2010), 1-12. Retrieved from

Richter, T. & Mcpherson, M. (2012). Open educational resources: education for the world? Distance Education, 33(2), 201-219. Retrieved from

Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: staff attitudes and awareness. Research In Learning Technology, 20.

Spink, A. & C. Cool, (1999). Education for Digital Libraries, in D-Lib Magazine. Retrieved from

Stella, A. (2010). Keynote Address: Quality and Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The Opportunities and Challenges of OER. Australian Quality Agency, 11. Retrieved from

Schuwer, R. & Wilson, T. (2010). Production of OER, a Quest for Efficiency. 7th Annual Open Education Conference, 2-4 November 2010, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from

Tuomi, I. (2006). Open Educational Resources: What they are and why do they matter. Report prepared for the OECD. Retrieved from

UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of Open Courseware for higher education in developing countries, final report. Retrieved from

UNESCO. (2011). Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education. Unesco, Ed. Higher Education. Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from

Vandendorpe, Ch. (2009) From Papyrus to Hypertext. Toward the Universal Digital Library. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Wiley, D. (2007). On the Sustainability of Open Educational Resource Initiatives in Higher Education: Paper commissioned by the OECD ’ s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). OECD Publishing. Retrieved from

Wiley, D. & Gurrell, S. (2009). A decade of development…. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 11-21.

Windle, R. J., Wharrad, H., McCormick, D., Laverty, H. & Taylor, M. G. (2010). Sharing and reuse in OER: experiences gained from open reusable learning objects in health. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (01), 1-18. Retrieved from

Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.



  • There are currently no refbacks.