Designing Continuing Professional Development MOOCs to promote the adoption of OER and OEP

Shironica Priyanthi Karunanayaka, Som Naidu, J.C.N. Rajendra, S.A. Ariadurai

Abstract


There is growing interest in the adoption of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP) in a variety of contexts. Continuing professional development (CPD) among practitioners in the effective adoption of OER and OEP is critical in this scenario. Massive open online courses (MOOCs), which also grew as part of the open education movement, provide a feasible means for this purpose. MOOCs are considered a ‘disruptive innovation’ in making free and open learning opportunities accessible to large numbers. Yet, the design of an effective massive online course that is as robust as a great online course with smaller student numbers where good principles of teaching and learning are maintained, is very challenging. Most contemporary MOOCs tend to have a content-driven focus of knowledge transmission, deviating from its original focus of knowledge generation. With the intention of providing learning experiences to promote learner engagement with OER, rather than presenting content about OER, we designed four CPD MOOCs to support the integration of OER and adoption OEP by practitioners based on a scenario-based learning (SBL) approach. This paper presents the analysis and design phases of this process, discussing the challenges faced and innovative strategies adopted in our pursuit to answer the question, “How best to design effective MOOCs on OER and OEP for continuing professional development of practitioners?”


Keywords


MOOC design; Continuing Professional Development; Open Educational Resources; Open Educational Practices; Scenario-based Learning; Learning Experience Design

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning In T. Anderson (Ed.) The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.) (pp 45-74). Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.ucv.cl/site/colecciones/manuales_u/99Z_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf

Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or Peril: MOOCs and Open and Distance Education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.4943&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Andrade, A., Ehlers, U. D., Caine, A., Carneiro, R., Conole, G., Kairamo, A. K., Koskinen, T., Kretschmer, T., Moe-Pryce, N., Mundin, P. & Nozes, J. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. OPAL Report 2011. Essen, Germany: Open Education Quality Initiative. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/OPAL2011.pdf

Barrows, H.S. & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer

Bates, A.W. (2014, October 13). Comparing xMOOCs and cMOOCs: philosophy and practice. [Weblog]. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/13/comparing-xmoocs-and-cmoocs-philosophy-and-practice/

Bates, A.W. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/

Bayne, S. & Ross, J. (2014). The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: the UK view. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/hea_edinburgh_mooc_web_240314_1.pdf

Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). JISC open practices: Briefing paper (1–12). Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/58444186/Open%20Practices%20briefing%20paper.pdf

Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E. & Zawacki-Ritcher, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3080/4284

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.

CEMCA (2014). Professional development programme on OER-based eLearning. New Delhi: CEMCA. Retrieved from http://cemca.org.in/ckfinder/userfiles/files/OER%20-%20Modules_Low.pdf

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Art-18. Retrieved from https://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf

Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10

Evans, S. & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999), Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.

Karunanayaka, S., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J., & Ratnayake, H. (2015). From OER to OEP: Shifting Practitioner Perspectives and Practices with Innovative Learning Experience Design. Open Praxis, 7(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.252

Karunanayaka, S. P., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J., & Ratnayake, H. (2017). Designing reflective practice in the context of OER-based eLearning. Journal of Learning for Development, 4(2), 143–160. Retrieved from http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/210

Karunanayaka, S. P., Rajendra, J.C.N. & Ratnayake, H.U.W., Naidu, S. (2016). Peer-facilitated discussions to enhance OER-based eLearning. AAOU Journal, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0022

Laurillard, D. (2014). Anatomy of a MOOC for teacher CPD. Retrieved from http://www.iite.unesco.org/files/news/639194/Anatomy_of_a_MOOC.pdf

Littlejohn, A. & Milligan, C. (2015). Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning. eLearning Papers, 42, article no. 4

Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531

Merrill, M.D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43–59.

Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional designs for distance education. In M.G. Moore (Ed.). Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). (pp. 247–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Naidu, S. (2010). Using scenario-based learning to promote situated learning and develop professional knowledge. In E.P. Errington (Ed.). Preparing graduates for the professions using scenario-based learning (pp. 39–49). Brisbane: Post Pressed.

Naidu, S. (2015). Lessons we are not learning or choosing to ignore! Distance Education, 36(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1083645

Naidu, S. & Karunanayaka, S. (2014). Engines of Education: Integrating OER in Learning and Teaching. In S. Karunanayaka & S. Naidu (Eds). Integrating OER in Educational Practice: Practitioner Stories. The Open University of Sri Lanka. (pp 3–22). Retrieved from http://www.ou.ac.lk/home/images/OUSL/publications/intergratingOERinEducationalPractice.pdf

Naidu, S., Menon, M., Gunawardena, C., Lekamge, D., & Karunanayaka, S, (2007). How can scenario-based learning engender and promote reflective practice in online and distance education. In M. Spector (Eds.), Finding Your Online Voice: Stories Told by Experienced Online Educators (pp. 53–72), NJ: Lawrence.

Naidu, S. & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 27(5), 329-354.

Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228761562_Theoretical_origins_of_concept_maps_how_to_construct_them_and_uses_in_education

Pickering, J.D. & Swinnerton, B.J. (2017). An Anatomy Massive Open Online Course as a Continuing Professional Development Tool for Healthcare Professionals. Medical Science Educator, 27(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0383-7

Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/EducationalDesignResearch.pdf#page=102

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D. & Jasper, M. (2001). Critical reflection in nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Siemens, G. (2012, June 3). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? [Weblog]. Retrieved from http:// www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/

Siemens, G. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in Education? Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/pub_PS_OER-IRP_CH1.pdf

Spector, J.M. & Koszalka, T.A. (2004). The DEEP Methodology for assessing learning in complex domains (Final report to the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building). New York: Syracause University.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education: A White paper. JISC CETIS Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.826

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.