Collaborative design of Open Educational Practices: An Assets based approach

Kate Helen Miller, Ronald McIntyre, Gary McKenna


This paper outlines a collaborative approach to the design of open educational resources (OER) with community stakeholders so they can be shared with other community practitioners openly, online and repurposed for other contexts. We view curriculum not as something that educationalists provide but rather something that emerges as learners engage with an educational context. We draw on a Project consisting of a partnership between five European Institutions of Higher Education and a range of community stakeholder groups. The partnership will develop a suite of OER for community workers who are implementing assets based approaches in different contexts. We argue that these approaches are negotiated in that one cannot decide how they might operate in a given context without engaging in deliberative discussion. The challenge for us as open education practitioners is how to turn those deliberations into OER and to highlight the important pedagogical aspect of the design process.


Collaboration; Design; Assets based Approaches; Open Educational Practice; Collaborative Open Educational Resources

Full Text:



Cannell, P. & Macintyre, R. (2017). Free open online resources in workplace and community settings – a case study on overcoming barriers. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 19(1), 111–122.

Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 604–623.

Corbett, A.C. (2005). Experiential Learning Within the Process of Opportunity Identification and Exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473–491.

Deuchar, R. & Bone, T. (2015). The Impact of Assets-Based Community Integration Initiatives in Scottish and Danish Locations. SIPR Research Summary Briefing. No. 20. The Scottish Institute for Policing Research. Retrieved from

Dewey, J. [1910] (2012). How We Think. Martino Publishing: CT, USA.

Di Salvo, C. (2012). Adversarial Design. MIT Press: MA Cambridge.

Edwards, R. & Miller, K. (2007). Putting the context into learning. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(3), 263–74.

European Commission (2013). Communication Opening up Education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new Technologies and Open Educational Resources /COM/2013/0654 final/. Retrieved from

Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H. & Unwin, L. (2006). Improving Workplace Learning. Routledge: London.

Illeris, K. (2011). The Fundamentals of Workplace Learning: Understanding How People Learn in Working Life. Routledge: London.

Kretzmann, J. & Mcknight, J. (1993). Building Communities from the inside out: a path towards building and mobilising a communities assets. The Asset-Based Community Development Institute. Evanston, Illinois: ACTA Publications.

Lane, A., & Van Dorp, K. J. (2011). Open educational resources and widening participation in higher education: Innovations and lessons from open universities. In EDULEARN11, the 3rd annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 4th-5th of July 2011, Barcelona. Retrieved from

Macintyre, R. (2014a). Uncertainty, Learning Design, and Inter disciplinarity: Systems and Design Thinking in the School Classroom. In Designs for Learning 4th International Conference, 6th–9th of May 2014, The University of Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from

Macintyre, R. (2014b). Open Design and Social Inclusion in Practice. In Designing Learning Landscapes: Mobile, Open, Inclusive, 30th of May, Goldsmiths University of London.

Macintyre, R. (2016). Approaching Participatory Design in “Citizen Science”. In Design for Learning: 5th International Conference designing new learning ecologies, 18th–20th of May, Copenhagen. Retrieved from

Malpass, M. (2017). Critical Design in Context: History Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic Publishing: London.

Mannion, G., Miller, K., Gibb, I. & Goodman, R. (2009). Reading, Writing, Resonating: striking chords across the contexts of students’ everyday and college lives. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(3), 323–339.

Mathie, A., Cameron, J. & Gibson, K. (2017). Asset-based and citizen-led development: Using a diffracted power lens to analyze the possibilities and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 17(1), 54–66.

Whitehead J., & McNiff J. (2006). Action Research Living Theory, Sage: London.



  • There are currently no refbacks.