Course-embedded student support for online English language learners

Maureen Andrade

Abstract


This paper describes an embedded approach to learner support in online English language courses. The support model is based on language acquisition, transactional distance, and self-regulated learning theories. Based on these theories, courses were designed to provide the interaction necessary for academic English language gains, decrease the transactional distance between the teacher and learner, and assist learners in developing the ability to control the factors that affect their learning; in other words, to be self-regulated learners. The latter is critical for those who lack the autonomy needed for successful distance learning. In this paper, three course activities are described and analyzed to demonstrate how the embedded support model responds to the needs of diverse learners and assists them in achieving identified outcomes. The courses were designed for off-site international students enrolled in traditional English-speaking higher education institutions.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.90


Keywords


distance learning, English as a second language, student support

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012

Altbach, P. G.; Reisberg, L. & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001831/183168e.pdf

Andrade, M. S. (2012). Self-regulated learning activities: Supporting success in online courses. In J. S. Moore & A. D. Benson (Eds.). International Perspectives of Distance Learning in Higher Education (pp. 111-132). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/33745

Andrade, M.S. (in press). Dialogue and structure: Enabling learner self-regulation in technology enhanced learning environments. European Educational Research Journal.

Andrade, M. S. & Bunker, E. L. (2009). A model for self‐regulated distance language learning. Distance Education, 30(1), 47-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845956

Andrade, M. S. & Bunker, E. L. (2011). Developing self-regulated distance language learners: A promising practice. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Self-regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments conference sponsored by the Targeted Cooperative Network of European Institutions (STELLAR-TACONET), Barcelona, Spain (pp. 113-125).

Barrett-Lennard, S.; Dunworth, K. & Harris, A. (2011). The good practice principles: Silver bullet or starter gun? Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 5(2), A99–A106.

Belaja, K.; Sai, G. T. B. & Lin, A. L. W. (2012). Effects of lecturer’s transactional presence towards learners’ intrinsic motivation in learning English as a second language through distance education. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 77-97.

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Dembo, M. H. & Eaton, M. J. (2000). Self-regulation of academic learning in middle-level schools. Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 473-490

Dembo, M. H.; Junge, L.G. & Lynch, R. (2006). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Implications for web-based education. In H. F. O’Neil & R. S. Perez (Eds.). Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 185-202). Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dembo, M. H. & Seli, H. (2008). Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A self-management approach (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, New York

Dettori, G. & Torsani, S. (2013). Enriching formal language learning with an information social networking component. Technology & Society, 16(1), 93-103.

Galloway, F. J. & Jenkins, J. R. (2009). The adjustment problems faced by international students in the United States: A comparison of international students and administrative perceptions at two private, religiously affiliated universities. NASPA Journal, 46(4), 661-673.

Garrison, R. D. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M.G. Moore & W.G. Anderson (Eds.). Handbook of distance education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gaskell, A. (2012). Editorial. Changing models of learner support: The role and cost of online learning. Open Learning, 27(2), 99-102.

Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learning: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles, and approaches. Distance Education, 27(3), 303-329.

International Council for Open and Distance Education and European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. (2009, June). Statement on international development and open, distance and flexible learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Council for Open and Distance Learning, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Campagnes/ICDE2009/ID_M-2009%20-%20WCHE.pdf

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Means, B.; Toyama, Y.; Murphy, R.; Bakia, M. & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC, U.S.: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

Moore, M. G. (2013). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.). Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 66-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

Sherry, M.; Thomas, P. & Chui, W. H. (2010). International students: A vulnerable student population. Higher Education, 60, 33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9284-z

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.). For H.G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press.

White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Xiao, J. (2012). Successful and unsuccessful distance language learners: an 'affective' perspective. Open Learning, 27(2), 121-136.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.). Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.90

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.